Compare Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | DeepSeek | $1.33 / 1M tokens | $3.98 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 1668-14930ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.8 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.8-flash | $0.75 / 1M tokens | $3.75 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper ($0.75 / 1M tokens input / $3.75 / 1M tokens output) vs Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 ($1.33 / 1M tokens input / $3.98 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash to optimize cost, or Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.