Compare DeepSeek-V4-1-Flash-GLB (DeepSeek) and Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-V4-1-Flash-GLBdeepseek/deepseek-v4-1-flash-glb | DeepSeek | $0.3 / 1M tokens | $1.20 / 1M tokens | 1M | Streaming | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 1557-3097ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | DeepSeek | $1.33 / 1M tokens | $3.98 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 2161-2773ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
DeepSeek-V4-1-Flash-GLB is cheaper ($0.3 / 1M tokens input / $1.20 / 1M tokens output) vs Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 ($1.33 / 1M tokens input / $3.98 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Chinese. Pick DeepSeek-V4-1-Flash-GLB to optimize cost, or DeepSeek-V4-1-Flash-GLB for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.