Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)anthropic/claude-opus-4.7-fast | Anthropic | $5.64 / 1M tokens | $28.21 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper ($0.723 / 1M tokens input / $3.62 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) ($5.64 / 1M tokens input / $28.21 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.