Modellvergleich

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Welches Modell sollten Sie wahlen?

  • Price: roughly equal total cost ($0.723 / 1M tokens input / $3.62 / 1M tokens output).

Seite an Seite

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 — vollstandiger Vergleich

Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.

ModelProviderInputOutputContextCapabilitiesBest forLatencyStatusSource
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4.6Anthropic$0.723 / 1M tokens$3.62 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7anthropic/claude-opus-4.7Anthropic$0.723 / 1M tokens$3.62 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated

FAQ

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 FAQ

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper?

Their total cost is roughly equal: $0.723 / 1M tokens input / $3.62 / 1M tokens output.

Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?

Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 for Vision: which should I pick?

Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.