Compare Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (X Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.5anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1762-2887ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Grok 4.6x-ai/grok-4.6 | X Ai | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $6 / 1M tokens | 500k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Grok 4.6 is cheaper ($2 / 1M tokens input / $6 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 4.5 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Grok 4.6 is larger (500k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Grok 4.6 to optimize cost, or Grok 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche