Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Gemini) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Imagegemini/gemini-3.1-flash-image | Gemini | $0 / 1M tokens | $0 / 1M tokens | — | StreamingVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is cheaper ($0 / 1M tokens input / $0 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 ($0.723 / 1M tokens input / $3.62 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 is larger (200k tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Image to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche