Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-6.1 Solopenai/gpt-6.1-sol | OpenAI | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2489-8238ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper ($0.1 / 1M tokens input / $0.5 / 1M tokens output) vs GPT-6.1 Sol ($2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
GPT-6.1 Sol is larger (1.1M tokens) vs 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 to optimize cost, or GPT-6.1 Sol for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.