Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) (Gemini) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-image | Gemini | $0.151 / image | — | — | StreamingVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) is cheaper ($0.151 / image per image) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.1 / 1M tokens input / $0.5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is larger (1M tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) to optimize cost, or Claude Haiku 5.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.