Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1327-2183ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 | Anthropic | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1230-2392ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or Claude Sonnet 5.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.