Compare Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 | Anthropic | $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1178-3573ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Fable 5.1 ($10 / 1M tokens input / $50 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Fable 5.1 is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or Claude Fable 5.1 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche