Compare Qwen3.5 Flash GLB (Qwen) and grok-4-1-fast-reasoning (X Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5 Flash GLBqwen/qwen3.5-flash-glb | Qwen | $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.4 / 1M tokens | 1M | Streaming | General chat via Qwen, API workloads | 2192-5333ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| grok-4-1-fast-reasoningx-ai/grok-4.1-fast-reasoning | X Ai | $0.2 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 2M | Streaming | General chat via X Ai, API workloads | 1684-3916ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Qwen3.5 Flash GLB is cheaper ($0.1 / 1M tokens input / $0.4 / 1M tokens output) vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning ($0.2 / 1M tokens input / $0.5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning is larger (2M tokens) vs 1M tokens.
Both target High quality. Pick Qwen3.5 Flash GLB to optimize cost, or grok-4-1-fast-reasoning for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.