Model comparison

Kimi-K2.5 vs GLM-5

Compare Kimi-K2.5 (Moonshotai) and GLM-5 (Z Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Which should you pick?

  • Price: GLM-5 is cheaper ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $2.58 / 1M tokens output) vs Kimi-K2.5 ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $3.02 / 1M tokens output).
  • Context: Kimi-K2.5 has the larger context window (256k tokens).
  • Kimi-K2.5 adds: Vision.

Side by side

Kimi-K2.5 vs GLM-5 — full comparison

Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.

ModelProviderInputOutputContextCapabilitiesBest forLatencyStatusSource
Kimi-K2.5moonshotai/kimi-k2.5Moonshotai$0.58 / 1M tokens$3.02 / 1M tokens256k
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1057-1836msCatalogPlatform curated
GLM-5z-ai/glm-5Z AiStarting at $0.58 / 1M tokens$2.58 / 1M tokens198k
StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context
General chat via Z Ai, API workloads1431-2367msCatalogPlatform curated

FAQ

Kimi-K2.5 vs GLM-5 FAQ

Is Kimi-K2.5 or GLM-5 cheaper?

GLM-5 is cheaper ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $2.58 / 1M tokens output) vs Kimi-K2.5 ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $3.02 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi-K2.5 or GLM-5?

Kimi-K2.5 is larger (256k tokens) vs 198k tokens.

Kimi-K2.5 vs GLM-5 for Long context: which should I pick?

Both target Long context. Pick GLM-5 to optimize cost, or Kimi-K2.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.