Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3

Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and GLM 5.3 (Z Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Which should you pick?

Price: GLM 5.3 is cheaper ($1.40 / 1M tokens input / $4.40 / 1M tokens output) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash ($1.50 / 1M tokens input / $7.50 / 1M tokens output).
Gemini 3.7 Flash adds: Vision.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 — full comparison

Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.

Model	Provider	Input	Output	Context	Capabilities	Best for	Latency	Status	Source
Gemini 3.7 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash	Google	$1.50 / 1M tokens	$7.50 / 1M tokens	1M	StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision	image understanding, multimodal chat	2092-2835ms	Catalog	Platform curated
GLM 5.3z-ai/glm-5.3	Z Ai	$1.40 / 1M tokens	$4.40 / 1M tokens	1M	StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context	General chat via Z Ai, API workloads	5533-10057ms	Catalog	Platform curated

FAQ

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FAQ

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM 5.3 cheaper?

GLM 5.3 is cheaper ($1.40 / 1M tokens input / $4.40 / 1M tokens output) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash ($1.50 / 1M tokens input / $7.50 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM 5.3?

Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 for Long context: which should I pick?

Both target Long context. Pick GLM 5.3 to optimize cost, or Gemini 3.7 Flash for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.

Gemini 3.7 Flash details GLM 5.3 details Pricing calculator OpenAI-compatible quickstart

Related comparisons

Compare other models

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3 Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 vs GLM 5.3