Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshotai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.5-flash | $1.50 / 1M tokens | $9 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1353-1653ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Kimi K3moonshotai/kimi-k3 | Moonshotai | $2.95 / 1M tokens | $14.71 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1837-5039ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper ($1.50 / 1M tokens input / $9 / 1M tokens output) vs Kimi K3 ($2.95 / 1M tokens input / $14.71 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash to optimize cost, or Gemini 3.5 Flash for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Related comparisons