Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Which should you pick?

  • Price: Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper ($2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 5.5 ($4 / 1M tokens input / $20 / 1M tokens output).

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 — full comparison

Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.

ModelProviderInputOutputContextCapabilitiesBest forLatencyStatusSource
Claude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5Anthropic$4 / 1M tokens$20 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1845-5119msCatalogPlatform curated
Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5Anthropic$2 / 1M tokens$10 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1230-2392msCatalogPlatform curated

FAQ

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 FAQ

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper ($2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 5.5 ($4 / 1M tokens input / $20 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 for Vision: which should I pick?

Both target Vision. Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 to optimize cost, or Claude Opus 5.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.

Related comparisons

Compare other models