Compare Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1930-4195ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $12 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2140-4871ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper ($2 / 1M tokens input / $12 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 4.6 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview to optimize cost, or Claude Opus 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Related comparisons