Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1327-2183ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 | Anthropic | $4 / 1M tokens | $20 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1845-5119ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 5.5 ($4 / 1M tokens input / $20 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Opus 5.5 is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or Claude Opus 5.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.